![]() He had a background in general laborer work and met the skill set necessary for the position. Reznick informed the human resources personnel team that Viergutz would not be a good candidate for this job, because he had a bad reputation and that it was not in Lucent s best interest to hire Brian for this job. his level of experience exceeded what the new position required. Reznick decided not to interview Viergutz because she knew from other managers that he had a poor reputation. Reznick recognized Viergutz s name because she had briefly supervised him. His application was forwarded by human resources personnel to the hiring manager, Melissa Reznick. In 2005, Lucent posted a job listing for installers, and Viergutz applied. While employed at Lucent, Viergutz had, by his own account, numerous interpersonal conflicts with his peers. In December 2002, Lucent reduced its workforce, and Viergutz was laid off. Background Lucent hired Viergutz in 1997 as an installer. ( Lucent ) in this action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. Plaintiff-Appellant Brian Viergutz ( Viergutz ), proceeding pro se, appeals from the order and judgment of the district court granting summary judgment to Defendant-Appellee Lucent Technologies, Inc. _/ BEFORE: MARTIN, SUHRHEINRICH, and WHITE, Circuit Judges. VIERGUTZ, LEONARD GREEN, Clerk Plaintiff-Appellant, ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO v. 08-3626 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT FILED BRIAN J. NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 10a0250n.06 No.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |